Edited on 24-Jul-2017 to add:
In the discussion below we agreed to move some of these topics from the VALA Tech Camp to the SIGs that most closely aligned with them. I’ve also added a ‘valatech17’ tag to each post so they can be easily brought back together again.
Moved to Metadata Management SIG
Moved to Resource Management SIG
- Order transactions able to be auto routed to our university Oracle system when paid
- Different selection approval process based on cost not type
- Automated workflows for EOD
Moved to Consortia SIG
Moved to Reporting SIG
Original post from 17-Jul-2017:
I started to write a new topic in the Resource Management area of Discuss.folio.org that pointed those community participants to some of the ideas posted here. (Thanks, @alvet for posting them!) And in writing that post, I started to draft a sentence that said something like:
Side note: as a community, we are still figuring out how best to integrate discussions from participants across time and space. While we are doing that, please feel free to join our Australian colleagues in discussing these items from their recent workshop.
I’m wondering instead if some of these topics should be moved to the functional SIG category where they are most closely aligned? I certainly don’t want to diminish the discussion that happened at VALATech, and I would encourage VALATech participants to continue discussing the topics. Unfortunately, this discussion software doesn’t give us the ability to list a topic in two categories (e.g. the Australia / New Zealand SIG category and the Resource Management SIG category).
Okay to move some of these topics to the functional SIG categories within Discuss.folio.org?